AI prompts go in. Fewer tokens come out.
Same quality. Lower cost. Your data stays yours.
Every prompt is optimized before it reaches the AI. Same meaning, fewer tokens. Quality verified across four providers.
Blind-tested on 512 real prompts across GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Gemini Pro, and Grok. Quality scores above 4.0 out of 5.0 on every provider.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Optimized for each provider's characteristics. Switch freely.
Military-grade encryption at rest and in transit. Your data is protected by comprehensive security controls designed from the ground up.
Change one import. Set one environment variable. Your existing code works immediately. No config files. No dashboard. No SDK complexity.
Compression runs in your environment. Your prompts never touch our servers. Zero data exposure by architecture, not policy.
The engine improves automatically over time. Patent-protected and encrypted end-to-end.
pip install ordica
Set your Ordica API key
Change one line of code
from ordica import OpenAI
Every API call is compressed
Same responses, fewer tokens
Ordica compresses prompts inside your own environment. We never see your messages, your API keys, or your data.
The only signal that crosses the wire is anonymous telemetry — token counts and savings percentages. This isn't a policy. It's the architecture.
Optimized for each provider. Switch between them freely.
Every message is a real-world test. An independent AI judges compressed vs. original responses without knowing which is which.
Blind-tested: an independent AI judged compressed vs. original responses without knowing which was which. Quality delta = compressed minus original. Positive means compression improved the response. Deltas within ±0.10 are within normal statistical margin.
All tests run on current production models. No cherry-picking. Full methodology available on request.
Based on validated compression rates. Actual savings depend on prompt mix and provider usage.
| Monthly API spend | ChatGPT | Claude | Grok | Gemini | Blended avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1,000 /mo | $2,796 | $3,144 | $3,156 | $1,632 | $2,682 |
| $5,000 /mo | $13,980 | $15,720 | $15,780 | $8,160 | $13,410 |
| $25,000 /mo | $69,900 | $78,600 | $78,900 | $40,800 | $67,050 |
| $100,000 /mo | $279,600 | $314,400 | $315,600 | $163,200 | $268,200 |
| Savings rate | 23.3% | 26.2% | 26.3% | 13.6% | 22.4% |
The numbers above are from short single-turn chat tests. Enterprise workloads with longer prompts, conversation history, and repeated system instructions compress significantly more.
Tested on 100 realistic enterprise scenarios — real prompts with real token volumes.
| Workload | Avg input | Compression | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Few-shot classifiers System prompts with repeated examples |
910 tok | 94.5% | |
| Customer service bots Large system prompts with product knowledge |
1,213 tok | 84.6% | |
| RAG pipelines Retrieved context with mixed relevance |
1,400 tok | 74.9% | |
| Multi-turn support Long conversations with 20+ turns |
1,073 tok | 31.4% | |
| Agent tool output Database results, dense tabular data |
694 tok | 9.5% |
Enterprise workloads with longer prompts and repeated context compress dramatically better than short chat messages. Average across all enterprise scenarios: 59%. The actual number depends on your workload type and prompt structure. These numbers improve with usage as the engine adapts.
Real enterprise prompts. Real savings. Same quality output.
Pre-computed from our validated test suite. Patent pending.
If we save you nothing, you pay nothing. The dashboard shows every dollar.
No. Your messages pass through the proxy to reach the AI provider, but we never store, log, or read them. The only data we keep is anonymous counts — how many tokens were sent, how many were saved, and which provider you used. There is no database column for message content. It doesn't exist in our system.
We test this blind across hundreds of real prompts on all four providers — and the number grows with every conversation. Quality scores stayed above 4.0 out of 5.0. The optimization ensures the AI receives everything it needs to give the same quality response, just with fewer tokens. Think of it as editing a wordy email before sending it. The meaning stays the same.
The compression adds a few milliseconds — you won't notice it. Whether you're using ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Grok, the provider's response time is what you feel, and that's unchanged. In some cases, shorter prompts actually get faster responses because the AI has less to process.
The system is fail-safe. If compression can't be applied confidently, your prompt goes through untouched — you just don't save tokens on that message. You'll never get a broken response because of compression. Worst case is zero savings, not worse quality.
ChatGPT (GPT-4o) is a strong all-rounder — great for general questions, writing, and brainstorming. Claude is known for natural writing and careful, thoughtful responses. Gemini has the deepest reasoning and largest context window. Grok is fast and conversational with less filtering. Try all four and see which one clicks for you.
During the alpha, yes — completely free. You're helping us test the compression on real conversations, which is valuable to us. There's no catch, no credit card, no upsell. After the alpha period, the chat interface may move to a paid model, but you'll know well in advance.
It tells us whether the AI's response was good or not — that's it. We don't see the response itself, just your rating. This helps us make sure compression isn't hurting quality. It's completely optional.
Alpha access is invite-only. Try the chat interface for free, or integrate the SDK in sixty seconds.
Aurora
Ordica Support